What Past Life Regression Actually Looks Like in a Session

Most sessions start the way any good conversation does - unhurried. I want to know why you're here, what's drawing you to this work, what you've already tried, and what you're quietly hoping for. Not because I'm assessing you, but because the conversation itself begins to soften something. People often tell me they feel settled before we've even started the 'hypnosis' part.

Sometimes there's nervous laughter. Sometimes there's a very specific question. Sometimes there's 'I don't really know why I'm here, I just felt I should be'. All of that is useful. Your subconscious is already tuning in, whether or not you realise it.

Then I begin the induction - a guided relaxation with breathing and simple visualisation. Nothing dramatic. No swinging pocket watches. Just a gradual settling that takes 10 to 15 minutes.

After the induction, I ask open questions. Not suggestive ones - nothing like 'imagine yourself in ancient Egypt'. The questions are more like 'what do you notice?', 'what's around you?', 'if there was a feeling here, what would it be?'. The point is to step out of the way and let your subconscious lead.

What clients describe varies enormously. Some see vivid scenes - cobblestone streets, a body in different clothes, a language they don't recognise. Some don't see anything at all, but feel a strong sense of a place or a time. Some get fragments - an object, a name, a relationship. Some get mostly feelings, with very little visual content.

All of these are 'normal' in this work. The ones that look like films in your mind get talked about most, because they're easy to describe. The quieter kinds - the feelings, the knowings - are often just as meaningful.

From where I sit, the most striking thing isn't what people say - it's how they say it. There's often a quality of surprise in the voice, as if they're reporting something they didn't expect. Details land specifically. 'A red scarf. My hands are rough.' People don't usually invent like that - invention sounds different. It has more hedging, more narration, more 'I think maybe'.

I also notice when a client is moving into something emotionally significant. The breathing shifts. The face softens or tightens. Tears sometimes come before the words do. I don't push. I just hold the space and let whatever is trying to surface come at its own pace.

This is where the work starts to look like inner child work more than what people picture as past life regression. The layers blur.

I gently bring you back after 45 to 60 minutes in the relaxed state. It's not a jolt - more a gradual return, like waking up naturally. You open your eyes, look around the room you've been in the whole time, and usually spend a few minutes just sitting with what arrived. I don't rush into interpretation.

Then we talk. What stood out? What felt meaningful? What didn't quite fit? What do you want to take with you? Often the real insight arrives not in the regression itself but in this quieter conversation afterwards. Sometimes people get it immediately. Sometimes the meaning lands days later.

These sessions are a complementary wellness practice, not medical or psychological treatment. What they look like from the outside is unremarkable. What they open up from the inside is often much more than people expected. If you're curious, a free consultation is the best place to start.