What Soul Regression Taught Me About Letting Go
Letting go is one of those phrases wellness culture has almost ruined. It sounds so simple. Just let go. As if people are holding on to things out of stubbornness, and the solution is a little more willpower and a deep breath.
In regression work I see the opposite. People aren't holding on out of stubbornness. They're holding on because some part of them believes that letting go is dangerous. That's a different problem entirely, and it asks a gentler kind of answer. These are some of the things deeper regression work has taught me about it.
If you're curious about regression more broadly, the about regressive hypnotherapy page is a good starting point.
What Regression Has Taught Me About Letting Go
Holding on is usually protective
The first thing regression has taught me is that when someone is holding onto something - a grief, a resentment, an old belief, a painful story - they are almost always doing it because a part of them believes they need to. It's not laziness. It's not stuck-ness. It's a quiet, protective strategy, often put in place by a younger version of them who thought this was the safest option available.
Once you see that, telling someone to 'just let go' starts to sound absurd. It's like telling someone to drop a rope they're using to hold themselves upright. They can't, and they shouldn't - not until the thing they're afraid of falling into has been met.
What the work actually does
Regression work doesn't force letting go. It does something quieter: it goes and meets the part that's holding on. In a relaxed state, clients can usually find the younger version of themselves who first decided to hold this thing, and understand why that decision made sense. Often it's a moment of feeling unsafe, unseen, or unable to ask for what they needed.
When that younger part gets met - not lectured, not corrected, just met - something shifts. The grip loosens on its own, because the need it was serving has been recognised. This is the opposite of 'just letting go'. It's closer to 'finally letting something in'.
Why the phrase gets in the way
The trouble with 'letting go' as a phrase is that it puts the burden in exactly the wrong place. It suggests the person holding something is the one who has to do the work of releasing it. But they're not the problem - the younger, protective part of them is. And the younger part isn't going to respond to adult instructions.
This is also why journalling, affirmations, and willpower so often fail to shift these things. They're aimed at the wrong layer. The work has to meet the protective part where it lives, which is usually much older than the conscious strategies we bring to it. It's closely related to inner child work and to the gentler side of healing from betrayal and relationship pain.
What letting go actually looks like when it happens
When letting go actually happens in a session, it's almost never dramatic. It's quiet. A client notices that something feels different. A breath comes easier. A weight they'd stopped noticing is suddenly absent. Sometimes they can't even describe what's changed - they just know they aren't holding something the way they were an hour ago.
I think this is what wellness culture got wrong about the phrase. Letting go isn't an act of will. It's a side effect of being met. When the protective part feels safe enough to rest, it does. That's all. These sessions are a complementary wellness practice, not medical or psychological treatment. A free consultation is a good place to start if you're carrying something you're tired of holding.
Book a free 30-minute consultation
Got questions or a specific goal? Let’s talk it through. In this free call we’ll check fit, outline a simple plan and walk you through how sessions run online. No pressure, just clarity.

Last updated: